Five things to watch in Senate GOP's ObamaCare repeal bill – The Hill

Tom MarkLast Update : Thursday 22 June 2017 - 12:00 PM
Five things to watch in Senate GOP's ObamaCare repeal bill – The Hill

A draft of the long-awaited Senate healthcare bill, crafted behind closed doors, will be publicly unveiled on Thursday.

Just a day before the bill’s scheduled release, some senators said they still didn’t know the details of some key provisions, creating uncertainty as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellSpecial election sweep boosts Trump agenda Five things to watch in Senate GOP’s ObamaCare repeal bill McConnell courts GOP centrists for health bill MORE (R-Ky.) pushes toward a vote next week.

Here’s what to watch for. 

How does it handle Medicaid?

ObamaCare’s Medicaid expansion has long been one of the thorniest issues for Republicans in their push to repeal the law.

ADVERTISEMENT

GOP senators from states that took the expansion, and their governors, don’t want to see their residents lose coverage. The Affordable Care Act gave states that expanded Medicaid extra money to do so, and lawmakers from those states worry ending this funding too early could beproblematic.

The House-passed healthcare bill would end extra Medicaid expansion dollars in 2020, but some senators have pushed for a longer transition. Leadership recently proposed a three-year transition beginning in 2020, but a contingent of moderate senators is advocating for a seven-year phaseout.

Two lobbyists told The Hill that the phase-out in the draft is likely to be over three years, but that timeline could be increased to five years next week if necessary to garner the support of more moderates.

And when asked about a three- and seven-year phaseout, Sen. John ThuneJohn ThuneSelf-driving cars are setting the stage for regulatory battle between feds and the states Five things to watch in Senate GOP’s ObamaCare repeal bill Driverless cars speed onto political agenda MORE (S.D.) — the Senate’s No. 3 Republican — said it would be closer to the latter.

According to a Senate GOP aide, Medicaid expansion will phase out over four years, from 2020 to 2024 with extra federal dollars first reducing in 2021. 

 The Senate bill is also likely to have deeper cuts to Medicaid than the House bill. The growth rate for a new cap on Medicaid spending levels would start the same as the House bill, but in 2025 would drop to a lower growth rate.

“I don’t support lowering the annual growth rate from where the House is,” Sen. Rob PortmanRob PortmanSenate Dem undecided on 2018 reelection run Five things to watch in Senate GOP’s ObamaCare repeal bill Portman slams North Korea in speech honoring Ohio native Otto Warmbier MORE (R-Ohio) said Wednesday. “The cost of Medicaid laid out by [the Congressional Budget Office] and also [the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services], cutting the growth rate will mean that states won’t be able to keep the same number of people on Medicaid without buying additional resources, and that’s a challenge.”

Are there provisions on abortion?

Defunding Planned Parenthood is important to some conservativesenators.

But preserving that funding is important for Republican Sens. Lisa MurkowskiLisa MurkowskiFive things to watch in Senate GOP’s ObamaCare repeal bill Overnight Energy: Dakota Access fight enters new phase Overnight Regulation: Labor groups fear rollback of Obama worker protection rule | Trump regs czar advances in Senate | New FCC enforcement chief MORE (Alaska) and Susan CollinsSusan CollinsFive things to watch in Senate GOP’s ObamaCare repeal bill McConnell courts GOP centrists for health bill Abortion language may be cut from Senate ObamaCare bill MORE (Maine), two crucial swing votes.

The initial draft of the legislation is expected to defund Planned Parenthood, but that language may have to be taken out for the bill to ultimately pass.

One abortion-related provision that likely won’t be allowed: the House’s ban on tax credits going toward plans that cover abortion. The provision is likely to be stripped out because it is said to fall short of the budgetary rules Republicans are using to repeal and replace ObamaCare and avoid a Democratic filibuster.

“I believe that did not pass through the parliamentarian’s review, so I don’t expect that to be in there,” Collins said Wednesday. 

How does it deal with pre-existing conditions?

The House bill has a waiver that would allow states to opt out of key ObamaCare insurance regulations — the provision was added to secure conservative support for the legislation, known as the American Health Care Act.

 But the waivers are controversial. In an analysis of the House-passed bill, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said the waivers allowing insurers to charge people more money based on their health status could price sick people out of the markets.

Going into this week, many expected that the change to the rules for pre-existing conditions would not survive in the Senate bill. On the other hand, reports suggested senators would keep a waiver permitting states to opt out of requiring insurers to cover a list of services, such as maternity and mental healthcare.

But it’s not entirely clear what will happen.

Asked about community rating waivers, Thune said, “I don’t think that’s a final decision made yet, but I would guess that’s unlikely.”

Senate Majority Whip John CornynJohn CornynFive things to watch in Senate GOP’s ObamaCare repeal bill McConnell courts GOP centrists for health bill Cassidy & Associates to become independent from parent company MORE (R-Texas) seemed to indicate Wednesday that the Senate bill would not touch pre-existingconditions.

“We’re going to try to send a lot of the authority back to the states and let them design the packages that suit their needs,” he said, “but we’re not going to do anything to change the current law when it comes to pre-existing conditions. I know which was a big concern with the House bill.”

How are the tax credits structured?

The House bill would provide low- and middle-income people  who don’t receive health coverage through work or a government program a tax credit to help cover their premiums, with the amount increasingby age.

The GOP received flack for how the provision would impact older adults. For example, a 64-year-old making $26,500 per year would pay more than half their salary in premiums, according to the CBO estimate.

The Senate bill is likely to beef up the tax credits, particularly for older adults.

For months, Thune has been examining tying the subsidies to age and income. So, Senate Republicans are expected to keep ObamaCare’s tax credit structure, just make them less generous. But it will provide more help to lower-income and older adults than the House bill did.

Sen. Rand PaulRand PaulFive things to watch in Senate GOP’s ObamaCare repeal bill McConnell courts GOP centrists for health bill Rand Paul calls to slow down ‘rushed’ ObamaCare repeal process MORE (R-Ky.), a conservative who has had harsh words for elements of the bill, has decried the refundable tax credits as “newentitlements.”

“Ninety percent of the ObamaCare subsidies remained in the House bill, and they’ve been adding to them,” he told reporters Wednesday. “What I’m very, very suspicious of is that when we add them up tomorrow there’s a possibility we could have more subsidies than ObamaCare has.”

Does it contain opioid funding?

Many parts of the country are in crisis due to record deaths from heroin and prescription painkiller abuse.

Some states, such as Ohio and West Virginia, have been hit particularly hard by the epidemic, and their GOP senators want $45 billion over 10 years to fund opioid treatment in the ObamaCare repeal-and-replace bill. The theory is this money could help offset Medicaid cuts, as many Medicaid recipients are now receiving addiction treatment through the program.

But a lobbyist familiar with the negotiations said the opioid money is unlikely to be included in the bill.

Another addiction treatment advocate wrote in an email that staffers from states dealing with opioid deaths are working to add the money to the bill. Without it, some senators might vote against the legislation. 

Peter Sullivan and Jessie Hellmann contributed.

Source: world

Short Link
2017-06-22 2017-06-22
Leave a Reply
0 comments
*Name
*Email
Required fields*

Your email address will not be published.

Comments Rules :

عدم الإساءة للكاتب أو للأشخاص أو للمقدسات أو مهاجمة الأديان أو الذات الالهية. والابتعاد عن التحريض الطائفي والعنصري والشتائم.

Type a small note about the comments posted on your site (you can hide this note from comments settings)

Tom Mark